Summary of “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”

In Protecting Freedom of twist on the Campus, the author, Derek Bok suggests how expressing yourself falls at a lower place the prototypal Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that skilful be incur it is protected by law does non mean that it is accountability, foolmly, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to test the limits to gain much attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such(prenominal) as displaying a coadjutor flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag outhouse be avoided.Freedom of expression is a right and should non be apply inappropriately. The First Amendment rights have caused much feud because it allows people to say, mo, or feel how they curb fit for example, hanging of a associate flag or displaying a swastika in public view. It is an insensitive flirt although it is their right to do so. According to the s upreme Courts ruling, the displaying of these symbols is protected under the First Amendment. Regretfully, people act and move because they are offended by things wish well this, but it is whiz of our many freedoms as Americans.Although it cannot be annuled it should be responded to in such a way they do not feel put trim or that they are wrong in expressing themselves, but rather suggest to them that it is deleterious and offensive to others. We have the right to be offended as others have the right to display or express their testify interests. Diverse communities in the United States make out certain laws to protect their properties from being vandalized with graffito and protect them from loud noise rules of this sweet should be evenly upheld in graze to not discriminate for or against anybodys opinions or ideas.If the governing authorities see fit to change the laws to prohibit such expressions, they should be cautious, because censoring such a great freedom can poten tially become dangerous. When one or much than than people feel that they are being weight-lifted in the opposite didactics than what they feel is right they tend to wax in a sense. More oftentimes than not they will try to push the boundaries to prove that they are free to do as they see fit and the more attention that is given to their cause the more they will show that they will not be told no.If an offensive act is being displayed it can be dealt with in a discrete manner to prohibit future conflict. For example, the offenders actions are ignored, they may in the end stop. Those in authority need to share charge and try an approach that may be more effective than prohibiting it. Persuading one to see the errors of their ways would be more productive rather than criticizing or objurgate them. It will help them become more aware of others well-nigh them and potentially bring in a more balanced for those around them.Therefore, members of faculty and officials should se ek to educate the students and bear them instead of using threatening tactics, as persuasion is more likely to become beneficial results. People are more willing to change when they are approached respectfully with inquiry, instead of abruptly and demanding. As a result, we should be conscious to uphold the virtuous standards of schools and colleges so we can positively coexist in these communities.